Its about finding a gap in the market, stupid!
On 21/10/2007, I had posted “80/20 rule of marketing success – find a gap” in which I had mentioned that MEOW the radio station has found a great gap and staked its claim to this space and that according to me it will be a great success. The reason my dear is very simple. They have found a gap and positioned themselves as a radio station for women.
Now I was surprised to read in Mint that there are more than 100 radio stations and another 300 are expected to be launched in the next 18 months. The sad part is that from what I can make out there is no one except MEOW which has really positioned itself effectively. In addition, MEOW has developed its offering through distinct programming in a “talk” format. I had actually heard them once and it was definitely good. Most of the radio stations just offer music with annoying DJs who crack PJs and come up with childish schemes. In fact, after living in US and listening to radio there, I find what radio stations are doing in India a little stupid. I am surprised that with TV stations copying American programs, why can’t radio stations do the same.
In fact, I had suggested a content based program to a couple of radio stations and they just ignored the same. I think they prefer what they are doing now.
Practically, all the experts agree that the radio stations need to differentiate themselves. What they are saying is that they should find a gap in the market and claim their stake on it. What’s the hurry? Well, being the first to stake your claim to a particular is what matters the most.
Prashant Pandey, CEO of Radio Mirchi says, “We are the leaders of the market. We don’t have to change. So many people already know who we are.” Do you think what Pandey is saying seems logical? Can anyone suggest how things can change for Radio Mirchi? For instance, MEOW takes away the women. RadioYoung takes away the young (I hope you guys know that we are going to have Youth TV from Amity which is again an excellent idea). RadioManagement takes away business listeners and so on and so forth. Don’t you think that with increasing number of radio stations filling in the gaps in the market, Radio Mirchi would not be left with much of an audience. So beware Shri Pandey.
It was surprising to read that practically all the radio stations are trying to differentiate themselves based on the campaigns that they are conducting. How does having a concert with AR Rehman position the Fever104 radio station vis-a-vis others, I just fail to understand.
If the radio stations cannot seem to find a gap to stake their claim, I think we should all help them. I think it would be an interesting exercise to suggest various positioning options for the various radio stations coming up. I have done this exercise with students in my class with fantastic results. Let me get the ball rolling for you.
Positioning options based on the type of music they play
(a) Ghazals
(a) Local regional music
Positionings based on talk show format
(a) Management
(b) Health
So lets get your marketing juices flowing and come up with as many positioning options that we can.
Avinash Narula
Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.

























When it comes to finding unique positioning, there are a million niche groups that a radio station for can cater to — how about a station for horror fans for example?The trouble is, that in India, we like playing it safe, so the radio stations too, do a Lowest Common Denominator number on their programming to appeal to the widest set in the audience. It’s more to do with greed for maximum listener-ship, rather than the desire to provide quality entertainment. Because targeting a niche group comes with the risk of limited audience… and limited advertisers and sponsors. The result? All radio stations sound the same!! And in the long run it means they lose out anyway! Ah! It’s that age old fight again: Quality vs. Quantity.
Reply